From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Hara v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 18, 1990
555 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-196.

January 18, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County; John E. Futch, Acting Circuit Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


We affirm in this cause, but certify to the Florida Supreme Court, as a question of great public importance, the same question certified in Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), and State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989):

IS SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), CONSTITUTIONAL?

DANIEL, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Hara v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 18, 1990
555 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

O'Hara v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRACY WAYNE O'HARA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 18, 1990

Citations

555 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Pryor v. State

Appellant argues that chapter 87-243 violates the "one subject rule" of Article III, Section 6, of the…