From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Hara v. Derschug

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

April, 1935.

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [ 154 Misc. 1.]


Order modified by eliminating the provisions relating to paragraph eighth of the complaint and paragraph eighth of the proposed amended complaint and by imposing as terms for allowing the amendment the payment within forty days from the date of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry of taxable costs and disbursements to date (exclusive of costs and disbursements of this appeal), and as modified affirmed, without costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes to impose as terms for the amendment the payment of all taxable costs and disbursements to and including the date of entry of the original judgment together with costs and disbursements of the appeal from the original judgment, such costs and disbursements of the appeal from the judgment not, however, to exceed $1,000. (The order grants leave to serve an amended complaint upon certain conditions.)


Summaries of

O'Hara v. Derschug

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

O'Hara v. Derschug

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD H. O'HARA, Respondent, Appellant, v. JOHN N. DERSCHUG, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Quaglia v. Steelco Stainless Steel, Inc.

Such is the rule in this department. ( Bates v. Salt Springs Nat. Bank, 43 App. Div. 321; O'Hara v. Derschug,…