From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ohanessian v. Chase Manhattan Realty Leasing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1993
193 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 27, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.).


According to plaintiff, he slipped and fell while descending the stairway from the mezzanine level to the lobby of the Westbury Hotel, operated by defendants-appellants in Manhattan. Plaintiff attributes his fall to a Christmas garland which had been affixed by defendants and apparently slipped off the bannister and onto the stairs. As this Court held in Trujillo v Riverbay Corp. ( 153 A.D.2d 793, 794), liability as to those in control of premises can attach where "it can be shown that the owner created the condition" on the steps (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836). The only basis on which liability may be predicated is that defendants "created" the condition, rendering "irrelevant" an inquiry into "the usual questions of notice" (Cook v Rezende, 32 N.Y.2d 596, 599). While there is no evidence as to the manner in which the garland was installed, clearly, such knowledge is in the exclusive possession of the defendants. In what manner the garland was installed, and whether the method so employed resulted in a dangerous condition created by defendants, raises issues of fact that must be resolved at trial.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Ohanessian v. Chase Manhattan Realty Leasing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1993
193 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Ohanessian v. Chase Manhattan Realty Leasing

Case Details

Full title:PHILIPPE OHANESSIAN, Respondent, v. CHASE MANHATTAN REALTY LEASING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 204

Citing Cases

Washington v. Autumn Props. Ii, LLC.

The only people authorized to use the power jacks were employees of Defendants. Contrary to NDA's arguments…

Nipon v. Yale Club of N.Y.C.

When the claim is based on an alleged defect in defendant's premises, plaintiff must prove that defendant…