From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 19, 2007
948 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

holding that order granting rule 8.135(b) motion after thirty days was a nullity

Summary of this case from E.W.L. v. State

Opinion

No. 2D05-2924.

January 19, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Highlands County, Marcus J. Ezelle, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas S. Connor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


O.H. appeals her juvenile adjudications and dispositions for battery, disrupting a school function, and resisting an officer without violence. We affirm her adjudications and dispositions without comment, but we reverse the original order of restitution.

O.H. was ordered to pay $102 in restitution for wages lost by the victim's mother in attending and testifying at trial. On February 23, 2006, O.H. filed a motion to correct disposition error pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2), which provides that a trial court shall file an order ruling on the motion within thirty days or the motion is deemed denied. The trial court granted the motion on April 19, 2006. Because the trial court did not rule on the motion within thirty days, the order granting the motion is a nullity. See E.J. v. State, 912 So.2d 382, 383 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (noting that rule 8.135(b) is the juvenile version of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)); Jackson v. State, 793 So.2d 117, 118 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that a trial court order that untimely rules on a rule 3.800(b) motion is a nullity). However, the trial court correctly determined that O.H. should not be ordered to pay restitution for the victim's mother's lost wages. See P.H. v. State, 774 So.2d 728, 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); J.S. v. State, 717 So.2d 175, 176-77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); J.B. v. State, 646 So.2d 808, 808-09 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Therefore, we reverse O.H.'s original order of restitution and remand for the trial court to enter a corrected order of restitution.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

O.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 19, 2007
948 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

holding that order granting rule 8.135(b) motion after thirty days was a nullity

Summary of this case from E.W.L. v. State

holding that an order granting relief on a motion to correct disposition error entered more than thirty days after the motion was filed is a nullity

Summary of this case from A.R. v. State
Case details for

O.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:O.H., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 19, 2007

Citations

948 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

S.T. v. State

Because the trial court did not file its order ruling on the appellant's Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure…

E.W.L. v. State

Although the trial court entered an order granting appellant's motion, the trial court did so past the…