From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ogunde v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2014
563 F. App'x 237 (4th Cir. 2014)

Summary

holding once a detainer is no longer in effect, the appeal is moot

Summary of this case from Nyang v. Barr

Opinion

No. 13-2391

03-28-2014

OLUDARE OGUNDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; JANET NAPOLITANO; RON ROSENBERG, Director, Arlington Asylum Office, Defendants - Appellees.

Oludare Ogunde, Appellant Pro Se. David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00484-JCC-IDD) Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oludare Ogunde, Appellant Pro Se. David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Oludare Ogunde appeals a district court order granting the Attorney General's motion to dismiss and dismissing his amended complaint seeking an order declaring that the immigration detainer placed upon him by the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") was unlawful. At the time Ogunde filed the amended complaint, he was in the custody of the Virginia Department of Corrections. He has since been transferred to the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement of the DHS. Accordingly, because the detainer is no longer in effect, the appeal is moot. See Central States, Se. & Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transp., Inc., 841 F.2d 92, 93 (4th Cir. 1988); see also Tucker v. Phyfer, 819 F.2d 1030, 1034 n.3 (11th Cir. 1987) ("[t]he mootness doctrine usually requires a court to dismiss an action in which, because of events occurring after the plaintiff filed the suit, any relief the court might grant would be of no utility to the plaintiff").

We dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Ogunde v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2014
563 F. App'x 237 (4th Cir. 2014)

holding once a detainer is no longer in effect, the appeal is moot

Summary of this case from Nyang v. Barr
Case details for

Ogunde v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:OLUDARE OGUNDE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; JANET…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

563 F. App'x 237 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Hunt

See United States v. Rodriguez-Amaya, 521 F.3d 437, 441 (4th Cir. 2008) ("[I]n agreement with every other…

Sanchez v. Hunt

See United States v. Rodriguez-Amaya, 521 F.3d 437, 441 (4th Cir. 2008) ("[I]n agreement with every other…