Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sater

Full title: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. DORY L. SATER, Respondent

Court: SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 12, 2018

No. 2530 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Oct. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2530 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 157 DB 2018

10-12-2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner v. DORY L. SATER, Respondent

PER CURIAM

Attorney Reg. No. 83783 (Delaware County) ORDER PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12^th day of October, 2018, following consideration of the responses to this Court's Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County shall enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent's clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g).

In the event that Respondent fully complies with the ODC's records requests, he can seek dissolution or amendment of this order, or request accelerated disposition of the charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(6).

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.