Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reisinger

Full title: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOSEPH R. REISINGER…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 11, 2015

No. 2199 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Sep. 11, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2199 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 44 DB 2015

09-11-2015

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOSEPH R. REISINGER, Respondent

PER CURIAM

Attorney Registration No. 1863
(Luzerne County)
ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11^th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the responses to a Rule to show cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute and it is ordered that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217; and

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County shall enter such orders as may be necessary to fully protect the rights of Respondent's clients or fiduciary entities with which he is involved. See Pa.R.D.E. 217(g).

The Petition for Permission to Amend Respondent's Response to Petition for Emergency Temporary Suspension is GRANTED.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.