Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKeon

Full title: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. JOHN HAROLD McKEON, JR.…

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 5, 2008

Nos. 23 DB 2005 and 122 DB 2005 (Pa. May. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 23 DB 2005 and 122 DB 2005.

May 5, 2008.

Nos. 1001 and 1053 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

Attorney Registration No. 30127 (Philadelphia).

RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5^th day of May, 2008, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Designated Member of the Disciplinary Board dated April 11, 2008, a Rule is hereby entered upon respondent pursuant to Rule 208(h), Pa.R.D.E., to show cause why the Orders of this Court entered January 5, 2006, and November 2, 2007, imposing probation should not be modified as set forth in the aforesaid Report and Recommendation.