From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Oct 31, 2011
NO. SCAD-11-0 0 0 04 83 (Haw. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

NO. SCAD-11-0 0 0 04 83 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ODC 06-089-8429 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 07-170-8630

10-31-2011

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. RICHARD K. GRIFFITH, Respondent. In re Application for the Reinstatement of RICHARD K. GRIFFITH, Applicant.


ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the record and the Declaration and exhibits submitted by Applicant Richard K. Griffith, it appears that Applicant Griffith has, in accordance with Rule 17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), filed the required documents requesting reinstatement to the practice of law. It further appears that Applicant Griffith has fully complied with the conditions of his one-month suspension and complied with the conditions of suspension set forth by RSCH Rule 16. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 17(b), that Applicant Griffith is reinstated to the practice of law in the jurisdiction of the State of Hawai'i, effective immediately.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 31, 2011.

Mark E. Recktenwald

Paula A. Nakayama

Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

James E. Duffy, Jr.

Sabrina S. McKenna


Summaries of

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Oct 31, 2011
NO. SCAD-11-0 0 0 04 83 (Haw. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. RICHARD K. GRIFFITH…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

NO. SCAD-11-0 0 0 04 83 (Haw. Oct. 31, 2011)