Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold

Full title: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. ALLEN L. FEINGOLD, Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 2, 2007

Nos. 93 DB 2003, 92 DB 2005, 1093 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, 1161 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Feb. 2, 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 93 DB 2003, 92 DB 2005, 1093 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, 1161 Disciplinary Docket No. 3.

February 2, 2007.

Nos. 93 DB 2003 and 92 DB 2005. Attorney Registration No. 03892 (Philadelphia).

RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2^nd day of February, 2007, the Petition for Rule to Show Cause Why Respondent Should Not Be Held in Contempt is granted, and a Rule is hereby issued upon respondent to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for willful violation of this Court's Orders of March 3, 2006, and August 22, 2006, and why the matter should not be referred to the Disciplinary Board for a hearing to recommend the appropriate sanction. Rule returnable within fourteen days of the date hereof.