From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odumbo v. Perera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 2006
27 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-09388.

March 28, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Vitaliano, J.), dated August 26, 2005, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Faust Goetz Schenker Blee, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Erika C. Aljens of counsel), for appellant.

Huttner, Mingino Budashewitz, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Elliot G. Budashewitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Santucci and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by demonstrating that the defendant, who either failed to stop at a stop sign or, upon stopping, failed to yield the right of way to the plaintiff's vehicle, was the sole proximate cause of the accident ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 [a]; Bongiovi v. Hoffman, 18 AD3d 686, 687; Willis v. Fink, 7 AD3d 519, 520; cf. Rossani v. Rana, 8 AD3d 548, 549). In opposition, the defendant failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Bongiovi v. Hoffman, supra; Breslin v. Rudden, 291 AD2d 471, 472; Bolta v. Lohan, 242 AD2d 356).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion for summary judgment.


Summaries of

Odumbo v. Perera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 2006
27 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Odumbo v. Perera

Case Details

Full title:SAMSON ODUMBO, Respondent, v. GAMAGE D. PERERA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2345
813 N.Y.S.2d 462

Citing Cases

Ward v. Press

The defendant has established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by tendering evidence…

Sukhu v. Marajh

Here, plaintiffs made the requisite prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment both by…