From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Donnell v. Fisher

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 18, 2019
178 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2018–13221 Docket No. V–02223–15/18C

12-18-2019

In the Matter of James O'DONNELL, Appellant, v. Elaine FISHER, Respondent.

Rhea G. Friedman, New York, NY, for appellant. Larry S. Bachner, New York, NY, for respondent. David L. Moreno, Staten Island, NY, attorney for the child.


Rhea G. Friedman, New York, NY, for appellant.

Larry S. Bachner, New York, NY, for respondent.

David L. Moreno, Staten Island, NY, attorney for the child.

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P. ROBERT J. MILLER, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Peter F. DeLizzo, J.), dated November 1, 2018. The order, without a hearing, in effect, granted the mother's motion to dismiss the father's petition to modify a prior order of parental access of the same court dated April 11, 2018.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

An order awarding parental access "may be modified upon a showing of a sufficient change in circumstances since the entry of the prior order such that modification is warranted to further the children's best interests" ( Matter of Madden v. Ruskiewicz, 117 A.D.3d 827, 828, 985 N.Y.S.2d 704 ; see Family Ct Act § 652 ). The Family Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, granting the mother's motion to dismiss, without a hearing, the father's petition to modify a prior order dated April 11, 2018, entered on consent, granting him supervised parental access with the parties' child. The facts alleged in the petition were insufficient to meet the threshold evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a hearing (see Matter of Newton v. McFarlane , 174 AD3d 67, 103 N.Y.S.3d 445 ; Matter of Perez v. Richmond , 148 A.D.3d 904, 905, 48 N.Y.S.3d 611 ; Matter of Scott v. Powell , 146 A.D.3d 964, 45 N.Y.S.3d 557 ).

AUSTIN, J.P., MILLER, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Donnell v. Fisher

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 18, 2019
178 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

O'Donnell v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James O'Donnell, appellant, v. Elaine Fisher, respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 18, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 9007
112 N.Y.S.3d 587

Citing Cases

Yon Renée Woodson Awoonor Renner v. Renner

Rather, a parent must make some evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances demonstrating a need for a…

Renner v. Renner

Rather, a parent must make some evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances demonstrating a need for a…