From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odoms v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 12, 2013
No. 63188 (Nev. Jun. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63188

06-12-2013

J. BENJAMIN ODOMS, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, to show cause. Petitioner challenges the procedural bars that have been applied to his previous post-conviction petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.

______________________, J.

Hardesty
______________________, J.
Parraguirre
______________________, J.
Cherry
cc: J. Benjamin Odoms

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney


Summaries of

Odoms v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 12, 2013
No. 63188 (Nev. Jun. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Odoms v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. BENJAMIN ODOMS, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

No. 63188 (Nev. Jun. 12, 2013)