From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 7, 2020
20-CV-0010 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-0010 (JMF) 17-CR-0321 (JMF)

07-07-2020

MARCUS ODOM, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER :

Movant Marcus Odom moves for (1) another extension of his deadline to file a reply in support of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, citing the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) appointment of counsel. See 17-CR-321 (JMF), ECF No. 44; 20-CV-0010 (JMF), ECF No. 13. Upon reflection, and upon review of the parties' papers filed to date, the Court finds that appointment of counsel is appropriate given, among other things, the substance of the Odom's central claim and Odom's inability to press his case in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(g); 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2); Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1985); Toron v. United States, 281 F. Supp. 2d 591, 593 (E.D.N.Y. 2003). Accordingly, Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma, the Criminal Justice Act lawyer on duty today, is hereby appointed as counsel for purposes of Odom's Section 2255 motion.

Counsel shall promptly contact Odom. Further, counsel is granted an extension until August 21, 2020, to file a reply in support of Odom's motion. Finally, counsel shall promptly confer with the Government regarding whether the case should be stayed pending a decision by the Second Circuit in one of the cases referenced in the Government's opposition. If either counsel believes that a stay is appropriate, counsel shall file a joint letter addressing the issue.

Because Odom has not at this time made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 17-CR-321 (JMF), ECF No. 44; 20-CV-0010 (JMF), ECF No. 13 and to mail a copy of this order to Odom, noting service on the docket.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 7, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

JESSE M. FURMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Odom v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 7, 2020
20-CV-0010 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Odom v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS ODOM, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 7, 2020

Citations

20-CV-0010 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 7, 2020)