From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odom v. International Paper Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 3, 2010
381 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2122.

Submitted: May 17, 2010.

Decided: June 3, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00480-MSD-JEB).

Carolyn P. Carpenter, Law Offices of Carolyn P. Carpenter, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Vincent Miraglia, International Paper Company, Memphis, Tennessee; Lynn F. Jacob, Williams Mullen, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Howard B. Odom appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant International Paper Company on Odom's action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Int'l Paper Co., 652 F.Supp.2d 671 (E.D.Va. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Odom v. International Paper Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 3, 2010
381 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Odom v. International Paper Company

Case Details

Full title:Howard B. ODOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 3, 2010

Citations

381 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Wootten v. Virginia

Because Plaintiff must rebut each legitimate, non-discriminatory reason, and she has failed to do so, the…

Nzabandora v. Univ. of Va.

Plaintiff must show that both of these reasons are pretextual, that is, that they were not the true basis of…