From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ODEN v. LOCKHEED MARTIN ASCO

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Feb 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:06-CV-1343-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 22, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:06-CV-1343-TWT.

February 22, 2008


ORDER


This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 63] of the Magistrate Judge recommending granting the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 48]. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff's racial discrimination and retaliation claims have no merit. The Magistrate Judge properly applied well established law to the undisputed facts. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 48] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ODEN v. LOCKHEED MARTIN ASCO

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Feb 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:06-CV-1343-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 22, 2008)
Case details for

ODEN v. LOCKHEED MARTIN ASCO

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL ODEN, Plaintiff, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN ASCO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Feb 22, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:06-CV-1343-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Griffin v. Gen. Elec. Aviation

Union involvement or affiliation is not a protected activity under Title VII. Burke v. Brennan , 2017 WL…

Griffin v. Gen. Elec. Aviation

Burke v. Brennan, 2017 WL 487021, at *6 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 6, 2017), aff'd sub nom. Burke v. Postmaster Gen.,…