From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connor v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1954
283 App. Div. 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

April 12, 1954.


In an action to compel the removal of an alleged physical encroachment on appellants' land, which encroachment is said to furnish lateral support to respondents' adjoining land, and for damages, appellants filed a notice of pendency of action against respondents' real property, under section 120 of the Civil Practice Act. Order granting respondents' motion to cancel the notice affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. ( Starkie v. Nib Constr. Corp., 235 App. Div. 699, and cases cited therein.) Nolan, P.J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

O'Connor v. Long

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1954
283 App. Div. 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

O'Connor v. Long

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES J. O'CONNOR et al., Appellants, v. WALTER A. LONG et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Schlaifer v. Shelby-Coleridge

What the plaintiffs seek in the action is a judgment declaring the rights of the parties in the said lot of…

Braunston v. Anchorage Woods

Plaintiffs are claiming no right, title or interest in the lands of defendants against which the lis pendens…