From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Connor v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1903
66 N.E. 1113 (N.Y. 1903)

Opinion

Argued February 26, 1903

Decided March 17, 1903

James M. Gifford and John Mulholland for appellant.

George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.


Summaries of

O'Connor v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1903
66 N.E. 1113 (N.Y. 1903)
Case details for

O'Connor v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. O'CONNOR, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of JONES O'CONNOR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 17, 1903

Citations

66 N.E. 1113 (N.Y. 1903)
174 N.Y. 517

Citing Cases

Willson Adams Co. v. Mack Paving C. Co.

In that case a contractor with the city, who was to furnish pipe and castings for certain work, the quality…

Duffy Bros. v. Bing & Bing, Inc.

In that case a contractor with the city, who was to furnish pipe and castings for certain work, the quality…