From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ochoa v. Spiers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 14, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-00619-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-00619-MMD-VPC

11-14-2013

ARTURO TORRES OCHOA, Plaintiff, v. K. SPIERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff has submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. no. 1-1). Plaintiff has not submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, nor has he paid the filing fee for this action. The Court will not grant plaintiff leave to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, because on at least three (3) occasions, the Court has dismissed civil actions commenced by plaintiff while in detention for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted," he may not proceed in forma pauperis and instead must pay the full $350.00 filing fee in advance, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

Plaintiff cannot proceed in forma pauperis in this action or any other civil action filed in any federal court because he has had three (3) or more prior actions dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or as frivolous or malicious. Plaintiff fails to plausibly allege that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that the exception to § 1915(g) applies "if the complaint makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced 'imminent danger of serious physical injury' at the time of filing."). Plaintiff must pre-pay the filing fee in full.

It is therefore ordered that this action will be dismissed without prejudice unless plaintiff pays the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this order.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff two (2) copies of this order. Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangements to have one (1) copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint.

____________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See Ochoa v. Cook, et al., 3:02-cv-00450-DWH-RAM; Ochoa v. Willis, et al., 3:02-cv-00545-ECR-VPC (both dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted); Ochoa v. Putter C/O, et al., 3:10-cv-00364-HDM-RAM (dismissed as delusional and factually frivolous). The Court takes judicial notice of its prior records in the above matters.


Summaries of

Ochoa v. Spiers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 14, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-00619-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Ochoa v. Spiers

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO TORRES OCHOA, Plaintiff, v. K. SPIERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-00619-MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2013)