From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ochoa v. Griffith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2909 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2909 KJN P

01-29-2013

PEDRO OCHOA, Plaintiff, v. G. GRIFFITH, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By an order filed December 13, 2012, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

___________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ochoa v. Griffith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2909 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Ochoa v. Griffith

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO OCHOA, Plaintiff, v. G. GRIFFITH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2909 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)