Opinion
Civil Action No. 06-4005 (JAG).
February 22, 2007
ORDER
This matter comes before this Court on the motion of plaintiffs, Cynthia O'Brien and Jacqueline Keenan ("Plaintiffs"), to remand the action to state court (Docket Entry No. 9), and Magistrate Judge Madeline Cox Arleo having issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R"), pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) and L. CIV. R. 72.1(a)(2), wherein she recommended that this Court deny Plaintiffs' motion to remand; and said R R having been filed on January 14, 2007; and the time within which to object to the R R having expired; and no objection having been made by either party; and it appearing that a magistrate judge's recommended disposition of a dispositive motion is subject to de novo review, In re U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d 142, 145-46 (3d Cir. 1998); Temptations, Inc. v. Wager, 26 F. Supp. 2d 740, 743 (D.N.J. 1998); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); and this Court having reviewed the parties' submissions and the R R under the appropriate de novo standard; and good cause appearing,
IT IS on this 22nd day of February, 2007,
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Arleo's R R is adopted as the opinion of the Court; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to remand (Docket Entry No. 9) is DENIED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order be served on all parties within seven (7) days of the date of entry of this Order.