From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'Brien v. Orleans Parish School B.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 29, 2000
769 So. 2d 1218 (La. 2000)

Summary

In O'Brien, suit was filed in federal court and later in state court against the same defendants arising out of the same facts. The defendants moved successfully for the dismissal of the federal suit.

Summary of this case from Hoover v. Livingston Par.

Opinion

No. 2000-C-1925

September 29, 2000.

IN RE: Orleans Parish School Board etal; Ducote, Kenneth J.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, Nos. 96-881; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-C-2607.


Granted. There is no evidence the federal court clearly declined to exercise its pendent jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law abuse of process claims. Federal principles of res judicata therefore bar the instant state court suit. See Reeder v. Succession of Palmer, 623 So.2d 1268 (La. 1993). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal, insofar as it finds plaintiff may proceed in state court on his claim for abuse of process, is reversed.

JPV

BJJ

CDT

JTK

KIMBALL, J., recused.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant and docket.

LEMMON, J., would grant and docket.


Summaries of

O'Brien v. Orleans Parish School B.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 29, 2000
769 So. 2d 1218 (La. 2000)

In O'Brien, suit was filed in federal court and later in state court against the same defendants arising out of the same facts. The defendants moved successfully for the dismissal of the federal suit.

Summary of this case from Hoover v. Livingston Par.
Case details for

O'Brien v. Orleans Parish School B.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT O'BRIEN v. THE ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD AND KENNETH J. DUCOTE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 29, 2000

Citations

769 So. 2d 1218 (La. 2000)

Citing Cases

Hoover v. Livingston Par.

Unlike the instant case, Reeder did not involve a petition filed in state court pleading all actions, a…