Opinion
2:22-cv-01730-TLN-JDP (PC)
11-16-2023
KORY T. O'BRIEN, Plaintiff, v. R. GARZA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION
ECF NO. 34
Jeremy D. Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file a reply to defendants' opposition to his motion to amend. ECF No. 34. Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiff argues that his reply brief was due by November 5, 2023. However, defendants filed their opposition on October 5, 2023, and, under the Local Rules, “[t]he moving party may, not more than fourteen (14) days after the opposition has been filed in CM/ECF, serve and file a reply to the opposition.” L.R. 230(l). Thus, plaintiffs reply was instead due by October 19, 2023.
1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 34, is granted.
2. Plaintiff is granted until December 6, 2023, to file a reply to defendants' opposition to his motion to amend.
3. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.