From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oberhauser v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
May 13, 2024
22-CV-2697 (KMM/ECW) (D. Minn. May. 13, 2024)

Opinion

22-CV-2697 (KMM/ECW)

05-13-2024

Daniel Jonathan Oberhauser et al., Plaintiffs, v. Merrick Garland et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KATHERINE M. MENENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright, dated March 25, 2024. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted.

The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.Supp.3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise, and the R&R is accepted in full.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.


Summaries of

Oberhauser v. Garland

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
May 13, 2024
22-CV-2697 (KMM/ECW) (D. Minn. May. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Oberhauser v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:Daniel Jonathan Oberhauser et al., Plaintiffs, v. Merrick Garland et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: May 13, 2024

Citations

22-CV-2697 (KMM/ECW) (D. Minn. May. 13, 2024)