Opinion
Case No. CIV-07-0843-F.
October 9, 2008
ORDER
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his concurrent applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits under the Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
In his Report and Recommendation of September 5, 2008 (Report, doc. no. 18), Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell recommends that the commissioner's decision denying benefits be affirmed. Plaintiff has timely objected to that recommendation.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed all matters and has reviewed all objected to matters de novo. Having done so, the court finds that it agrees with the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation and that no purpose would be served by restating here any of the magistrate judge's findings or analysis.
Accordingly, having carefully considered the parties' submissions, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge are DENIED. The recommendations of the magistrate judge are ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED in their entirety. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED.