From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakland Park Mri, Inc. v. Progressive Select Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 11, 2021
322 So. 3d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D21-914

08-11-2021

OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o Jose Cruz, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Christina M. Kalin and John C. Daly of Daly & Barber, P.A., Plantation, for appellant. Michael A. Graham of Progressive PIP House Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Christina M. Kalin and John C. Daly of Daly & Barber, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Michael A. Graham of Progressive PIP House Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam. Appellant appeals the dismissal of its complaint due to the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial stipulation. Appellant argues it was denied due process because the trial court sua sponte dismissed its complaint without notice or an opportunity to be heard. Appellee concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See, e.g. , Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Sanchez , 187 So. 3d 341, 342 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Gross, Damoorgian and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Oakland Park Mri, Inc. v. Progressive Select Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 11, 2021
322 So. 3d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Oakland Park Mri, Inc. v. Progressive Select Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:OAKLAND PARK MRI, INC. a/a/o Jose Cruz, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE SELECT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Aug 11, 2021

Citations

322 So. 3d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)