From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Oakes v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 18, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-00920 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-00920.

February 18, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's June 2, 2009 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Ralph Oakes is not disabled within the meaning of the Act.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant.

This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Oakes v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 18, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-00920 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Oakes v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Ralph Oakes, Plaintiff v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-00920 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 18, 2010)