Opinion
November, 1916.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell and De Angelis, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that it affirmatively appears that plaintiff's intestate was guilty of contributory negligence.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Nyland v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Summaries of
Nyland v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for
Nyland v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail
Case Details
Full title:ANNE C.H. NYLAND, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1916
Citations
175 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)