holding that where plaintiff "never properly brought . . . the valid commencement of an action . . . plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive or any other relief"
Summary of this case from MRS Prop. Invs. v. BivonaMay 23, 1989
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ethel Danzig, J.) entered on October 24, 1988, unanimously affirmed for reasons stated by Ethel Danzig, J., without costs and without disbursements.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.
holding that where plaintiff "never properly brought . . . the valid commencement of an action . . . plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive or any other relief"
Summary of this case from MRS Prop. Invs. v. BivonaFull title:NYLAND (CF8) LTD., Respondent-Appellant, v. JOACHIM F. VON GRUMME-DOUGLAS…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: May 23, 1989
The Town appeals from an order that purportedly denied the "Petition." "[T]he valid commencement of an action…
Wenz v. Globecomm Sys., Inc.Pursuant to CPLR 6311 a motion for a preliminary injunction may be served with or after the service of the…