From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1941
35 N.E.2d 498 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued April 7, 1941

Decided May 22, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, STEINBRINK, J.

Daniel Combs for appellants.

Carl E. Peterson for respondent.

F.W.H. Adams and John C. Morrissey for New York State Bankers Association, amicus curiae.


We agree that regardless of the construction of the scope and the effect of section 25-a of the Lien Law. no action at law can be brought by a single creditor. The determination of the construction and effect of section 25-a must await a case in which such question is necessarily presented.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ. Taking no part: LEHMAN, Ch. J.


Summaries of

New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1941
35 N.E.2d 498 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far Rockaway

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK TRAP ROCK CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL BANK OF FAR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 22, 1941

Citations

35 N.E.2d 498 (N.Y. 1941)
35 N.E.2d 498

Citing Cases

American Blower v. James Talcott, Inc.

Without entering into a discussion of these very complicated cases, we would merely point out that, in a case…

Saltser Weinsier v. Monroe Plumbing Heating

Laws, ch. 33) in the absence of the filing of a lien by plaintiff. ( Amiesite Constr. Corp. v. Luciano Contr.…