From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nuzzo v. Griffin Technology Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Stone, J.) the denial of the motion of third-party defendant, Syracuse University (University), to dismiss the third-party complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1). In addition, we reject the contention of the University that its contract with third-party plaintiff, Griffin Technology Incorporated (Griffin), by requiring Griffin to maintain specific policies of insurance and to name the University as an additional insured on those policies, required Griffin to cover the University for all liability arising under the contract, including the liability of the University for its own negligence. This is not an instance where the contract expressly requires one party to maintain insurance for all claims for injuries arising out of the contract, including those acts attributable to the party to be named as an additional insured (see, e.g., Murray v Curtis Co., 189 A.D.2d 980; Schumacher v. Lutheran Community Servs., 177 A.D.2d 568). The contract between Griffin and the University states the separate duties and obligations owed by each party and requires Griffin to maintain insurance coverage naming the University as an additional insured. The contract, however, does not specify the scope of that coverage, i.e., it does not require Griffin to maintain insurance coverage for all claims arising out of the contract. Thus, because the contract does not establish conclusively that the duty to insure exceeded the scope of the duty to indemnify, that documentary evidence does not definitively dispose of the issues of liability presented by the third-party complaint.


Summaries of

Nuzzo v. Griffin Technology Incorporated

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Nuzzo v. Griffin Technology Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA E. NUZZO et al., Respondents, v. GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 703

Citing Cases

Skoczylas v. 270 W. End Tenants Corp.

her such broad coverage is expressly provided for in the contract. See Bachrow v. Turner Const. Corp., 46…

Patzer v. Griffin Technology Incorporated

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ. Order unanimously affirmed with costs (see,…