Opinion
No. 80894
05-15-2020
Law Office of Mitchell Stipp Holley, Driggs, Walch, Fine, Puzey, Stein, Thompson/Las Vegas
Law Office of Mitchell Stipp
Holley, Driggs, Walch, Fine, Puzey, Stein, Thompson/Las Vegas
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges the district court’s actions in a receivership case. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160 ; NRS 34.320 ; Halverson v. Miller, 124 Nev. 484, 487, 186 P.3d 893, 896 (2008) (recognizing that the decision to issue a writ of mandamus or prohibition "is solely within this court’s discretion" and that petitioner bears the burden to establish that such extraordinary relief is appropriate). We therefore
ORDER the petition DENIED.