From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nutri Cheese Foods v. M. Slavin Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1992
184 A.D.2d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 16, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.).


Plaintiff's motion to amend the ad damnum clause to add a claim for punitive damages, made five years after commencement of the action in Civil Court, was properly denied (cf., Norman v Ferrara, 107 A.D.2d 739; see also, 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 3025.23). Punitive damages will not lie in an action for a mere breach of contract (Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc., 40 N.Y.2d 354, 358), nor can they be supported by subsequent allegations based upon events that occurred after the underlying transaction (cf., Levine v. Abergel, 127 A.D.2d 822, 824-825).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Nutri Cheese Foods v. M. Slavin Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1992
184 A.D.2d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Nutri Cheese Foods v. M. Slavin Sons

Case Details

Full title:NUTRI CHEESE FOODS, INC., Appellant, v. M. SLAVIN SONS, LTD., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 330 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 575

Citing Cases

Chaitman v. Moezinia

47, 888 N.Y.S.2d 489 [1st Dept.2009], lv. dismissed in part, denied in part 14 N.Y.3d 736, 898 N.Y.S.2d 74,…

Avildsen v. Prystay

It was not necessary for defendant to show special damage (see, Halio v. Lurie, 15 A.D.2d 62). There is no…