From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nutek Construction, Inc. v. Solpac, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Idaho
Jun 9, 2003
Case No. CV03-224-S-EJI (D. Idaho Jun. 9, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. CV03-224-S-EJI.

June 9, 2003.


LITIGATION ORDER


On June 4, 2003, Plaintiff filed the above-entitled action.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiff shall serve this Order on all parties.

2. Within sixty-nine (69) days from the filing date of the Complaint, pursuant to Local Rule 16.1, the parties shall meet and determine:

A. A litigation plan;

Attached is a Civil Case Litigation Outline which shall be used by the parties in determining their case litigation plan. The Court will expect the outline to be followed unless a showing by the parties is made that the case is highly complex in nature.

B. If consenting to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge is appropriate; and
C. If the case is suitable for an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) program such as arbitration, mediation or judicial settlement conference.
3. On or before August 21, 2003, the parties shall file with the court the Litigation Plan form and, if appropriate, the Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge form.
4. Within eighty-three (83) days from the filing date of the Complaint, initial disclosures shall be made by the parties pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26.1 and Local Rule 16.1.
5. A telephonic scheduling conference shall be held on September 4, 2003, at 9:30 a.m. mountain time, for the purpose of confirming the deadlines proposed by the parties in the Litigation Plan Form and to set the matter for trial.
6. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call by placing it to Diane McDonald, Administrative Assistant, at 208-334-9270 and shall have all appropriate parties on the line.

Pursuant to Local Rule 16.5, the parties shall discuss and determine whether or not they will participate in a mediation program. Mediation is a process whereby a trained, experienced and impartial neutral, selected by the parties and or the Court, will facilitate discussion, and assist in identifying issues and generating options in an attempt to resolve the dispute which prompted the litigation.
A party can move for withdrawal from the mediation process upon a showing that reasons exist as to why mediation would not be productive or otherwise should not a occur.


Summaries of

Nutek Construction, Inc. v. Solpac, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Idaho
Jun 9, 2003
Case No. CV03-224-S-EJI (D. Idaho Jun. 9, 2003)
Case details for

Nutek Construction, Inc. v. Solpac, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NUTEK CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. SOLPAC, INC. et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Idaho

Date published: Jun 9, 2003

Citations

Case No. CV03-224-S-EJI (D. Idaho Jun. 9, 2003)