From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NUTE v. YORK

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap
Jun 1, 1891
23 A. 367 (N.H. 1891)

Opinion

Decided June, 1891.

The heirs of a widow who did not release her dower and homestead right, have no title to the real estate of her husband.

WRIT OF ENTRY, for land in Alton of which Eben Hayes died seized. The plaintiffs are the heirs at law of Eben and the defendants are the heirs of his deceased widow. Eben died intestate January 10, 1890 leaving no child or the issue of any child surviving him. His widow died ten days later. She did not file a release of her right of dower and homestead in the probate office or registry of deeds. After her death the plaintiffs and defendants without legal advice and supposing the widow, and under her the defendants as her heirs at law were entitled to one half the land made by parol an equal division. The demanded premises were assigned to the defendants who occupied them and received the income about four months.

G. E. Cochrane and J. Kivel, for the plaintiffs.

E. H. Shannon, for the defendants.


The widow took her dower and homestead right. G. L. c. 202 s. 10; Laws 1883, c. 34. The defendants have no title. The rights of the parties are not affected by the parol division.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

NUTE v. YORK

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap
Jun 1, 1891
23 A. 367 (N.H. 1891)
Case details for

NUTE v. YORK

Case Details

Full title:NUTE a. v. YORK a

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap

Date published: Jun 1, 1891

Citations

23 A. 367 (N.H. 1891)
66 N.H. 541

Citing Cases

Morse v. Osborne

In this revision the provisions on the subject in behalf of both parties are first grouped together. G. L.,…

Horner v. Reynolds

To be effectual, the waiver or release must be in writing and filed in the probate office within one year…