Summary
finding claim that plaintiff fired from position as deputy clerk because of intimate relationship with man is analyzed as a liberty interest under the Due Process Clause
Summary of this case from Rihm v. Hancock Cnty. Pub. LibraryOpinion
Case No. 09-cv-1065.
September 8, 2009
ORDER
Before the court is Magistrate Judge Cudmore's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 14] on Defendants Pam Gardner's and Tazewell County's Motions to Dismiss filed on March 11, 2009 [Docs. 4 and 7]. The parties have not filed any objections within the ten (10) working days allotted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to timely object constitutes a waiver of any objections. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21 Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [Docs. 4 and 7] are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Illinois Whistleblower Act claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.