From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2011
83 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4824.

April 19, 2011.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered May 19, 2010, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Fiedelman McGaw, Jericho (James K. O'Sullivan of counsel), for appellants.

Michelle S. Russo, Pt. Washington, for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.


Defendants failed to establish prima facie that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition ( see Giuffrida v Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co., 279 AD2d 403, 404). While the superintendent asserted that he inspected the premises periodically, he failed to provide a time for the last inspection preceding plaintiffs fall ( see Porco v Marshalls Dept. Stores, 30 AD3d 284).


Summaries of

Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2011
83 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Nugent v. 1235 Concourse Tenants Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LOTTIE NUGENT, Respondent, v. 1235 CONCOURSE TENANTS CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2011

Citations

83 A.D.3d 532 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 3113
920 N.Y.S.2d 660

Citing Cases

Rivera v. City of Hous.

Neither his deposition nor his affidavit denies that he or any other building employee mopped staircase B…

Maldonado v. City of New York

Although defendant's submissions in support of the motion, including the testimony of the custodian of the…