From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novotech (Australia) PTY Ltd. v. SureClinical, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 9, 2023
2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC

03-09-2023

NOVOTECH AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, an Australian proprietary limited company, Plaintiff, v. SURECLINICAL, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendant. SURECLINICAL, INC., a Nevada corporation, Counterclaimant, v. NOVOTECH AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, an Australian proprietary limited company Counter-Defendant.


ORDER EXTENDING LITIGATION STAY (ECF NOS. 30; 41)

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER EXTENDING STAY

THE COURT, having considered Defendant and Counterclaimant SureClinical, Inc.'s Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending Litigation Stay, including all relevant documents, evidence, and arguments of counsel:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Ex Parte Application is DENIED. The litigation stay ordered by the Court on December 5, 2022 (ECF No. 30) and previously extended on January 20, 2023 (ECF No. 41) is lifted. From this point forward, any disputes between the parties regarding discovery, including the production of documents ordered by this Court on January 20, 2023 (ECF No. 41), shall be submitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Novotech (Australia) PTY Ltd. v. SureClinical, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 9, 2023
2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Novotech (Australia) PTY Ltd. v. SureClinical, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NOVOTECH AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, an Australian proprietary limited company…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 9, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)