From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Dec 5, 2022
Civil Action 9:19-CV-190 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:19-CV-190

12-05-2022

WOODROW RAYMOND NOVAK, JR. v. RONNY W. THOMAS, et al.,


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THAD HEARTFIELD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Woodrow Raymond Novak, Jr., an inmate currently confined at the Gib Lewis Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants William Jerry and Helen Sheffield.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (doc. # 85).

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.


Summaries of

Novak v. Thomas

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Dec 5, 2022
Civil Action 9:19-CV-190 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Novak v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:WOODROW RAYMOND NOVAK, JR. v. RONNY W. THOMAS, et al.,

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Dec 5, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 9:19-CV-190 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2022)