From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Novak v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 27, 1994
636 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2157.

May 27, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; Newman D. Brock, Judge.

Brian D. Stokes, of Bogin, Munns Munns, Orlando, for appellants.

Ernest H. Eubanks, of Eubanks, Hilyard, Rumbley, Meier and Lengauer, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.


This is the appeal of an order dismissing the action for want of prosecution. Appellants contend that there was non-record activity sufficient to meet the "good cause" component of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). Specifically, appellants refer to correspondence concerning the subject of possibly settling the action and concerning a dispute over expert witness fees. We affirm because we find nothing in the record to suggest that the lower court abused its discretion in finding a lack of "good cause" why the action should not be dismissed.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Novak v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 27, 1994
636 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Novak v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LINDA Y. NOVAK AND NEAL A. NOVAK, APPELLANTS, v. CORNING GLASS WORKS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

636 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)