From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 2, 2016
499 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151874. COA No. 319552.

02-02-2016

NOTTINGHAM VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. John PENSOM and Jane Doe Pensom, Defendants–Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that remands for an evidentiary hearing to determine reasonable attorney fees and costs due the defendants. The Court of Appeals does not provide authority for awarding attorney fees and costs to the defendants. This order is without prejudice to the defendants seeking in Wayne Circuit Court any attorney fees and costs to which they might be entitled. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Feb 2, 2016
499 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

Case Details

Full title:NOTTINGHAM VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. John…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 852 (Mich. 2016)
873 N.W.2d 778

Citing Cases

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions…