From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 2, 2016
SC: 151874 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 151874

02-02-2016

NOTTINGHAM VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN PENSOM and JANE DOE PENSOM, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 319552
Wayne CC: 12-013643-CH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that remands for an evidentiary hearing to determine reasonable attorney fees and costs due the defendants. The Court of Appeals does not provide authority for awarding attorney fees and costs to the defendants. This order is without prejudice to the defendants seeking in Wayne Circuit Court any attorney fees and costs to which they might be entitled. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 2, 2016
SC: 151874 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Nottingham Vill. Condo. Ass'n v. Pensom

Case Details

Full title:NOTTINGHAM VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 2, 2016

Citations

SC: 151874 (Mich. Feb. 2, 2016)