From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nottingham Assoc. v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 8, 1982
410 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-2706.

March 8, 1982.

Writ of Certiorari to Circuit Court, Dade County; Mario Goderich, Judge.

Norman Malinski, Miami, for petitioners.

George F. Knox, Jr., City Atty. and Terry V. Percy, Deputy City Atty. and Beatriz Bru, Asst. City Atty., for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


The respondent, City of Miami, confessed error before this Court at time of oral argument. Its position, with respect to both of the alternative theories that the document sought to be protected was either work product or not subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (The Florida Public Record Act), is, in the court's view, frivolous and utterly without merit.

Accordingly, certiorari is granted and fees in amount of $2,000.00 are awarded to the petitioner pursuant to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1978) and Section 119.12, Florida Statutes (1975).

Certiorari granted.


Summaries of

Nottingham Assoc. v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 8, 1982
410 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Nottingham Assoc. v. City of Miami

Case Details

Full title:NOTTINGHAM ASSOCIATES, A FLORIDA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP CONSISTING OF HENDRY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 8, 1982

Citations

410 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Nottingham Associates

Wagner insisted — and the city officials, after first concluding to the contrary, then for a lengthy period…