From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noto v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1964
21 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

May 18, 1964


In an action pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Law (now Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, art. 15) for determination of a claim to certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 14, 1964, which, upon reargument: (1) denied his motion to transfer the action from the Equity Calendar to the Jury Calendar; and (2) granted defendants' cross motion to vacate plaintiff's demand for a jury trial. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. An action to determine title to real property is triable by a jury (CPLR 4101, subd. 2). However, in his amended complaint the plaintiff included allegations setting forth, in addition, an equitable cause of action for specific performance, which is maintainable under the omnibus prayer for relief. By so doing, plaintiff has waived his right to a jury trial ( Di Menna v. Cooper Evans Co., 220 N.Y. 391; Vincent v. Cooperman, 283 App. Div. 812). Beldock, P.J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [ 39 Misc.2d 233.]


Summaries of

Noto v. Headley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1964
21 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Noto v. Headley

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY NOTO, Appellant, v. FRANCES P. HEADLEY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Whipple v. Trail Properties, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintiffs waived their right to…

Mollica v. William A. Ruzza,

Here, the plaintiff's complaint seeks to determine title to real property and includes allegations setting…