From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Notarte v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 9, 2012
No. CV 12-0101 JH/CG (D.N.M. Apr. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 12-0101 JH/CG No. CR 09-2049 JH

04-09-2012

ANGELITO CASTILLO NOTARTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

THIS MATTER is before the Court, sua sponte, for an Order directing Respondent to supplement the record pursuant to Rule 7 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Court. Petitioner has alleged that his attorney was constitutionally ineffective for failing to inform him of the immigration consequences of his appeal. (Doc. 9 at 1-13). Respondent claims that Petitioner's Presentence Report ("PSR") advised him of the likely immigration consequences of his plea. (Doc. 12 at 7). Respondent has cited extensively to the PSR to support its contention that Petitioner's claims have no merit. (Doc. 12 at 7-8, 12, 15-16). However, Respondent neglected to include a copy of Petitioner's PSR for this Court to review.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent supplement the record by filing a copy of Petitioner's Pre-Sentence Report. Because the PSR contains confidential information, Respondent is directed to file the PSR under seal. Respondent shall submit the PSR within fourteen days of this order.

___________

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Notarte v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Apr 9, 2012
No. CV 12-0101 JH/CG (D.N.M. Apr. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Notarte v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANGELITO CASTILLO NOTARTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Apr 9, 2012

Citations

No. CV 12-0101 JH/CG (D.N.M. Apr. 9, 2012)