From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Notaro v. Buffalo Waterfront Restr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 30, 1997

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment. Although plaintiff will bear the burden at trial of proving that defendant created the allegedly dangerous condition of the stairs or had actual or constructive notice of it ( see, Lowrey v. Cumberland Farms, 162 A.D.2d 777, 778), on its motion for summary judgment defendant bore the burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Jordan v Musinger, 197 A.D.2d 889). Defendant failed to meet that burden ( see, Jordan v. Musinger, supra; cf., Yaroschak v. Suffern Window Cleaning Co., 174 A.D.2d 887, 888; Katz v. New York Hosp., 170 A.D.2d 345; Lowrey v. Cumberland Farms, supra, at 778), and we therefore do not consider the sufflciency of plaintiff's submissions in opposition to the motion ( see, Ayotte v. Gervasio, 81 N.Y.2d 1062, 1063; Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Notaro v. Buffalo Waterfront Restr. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 30, 1997
239 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Notaro v. Buffalo Waterfront Restr. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. NOTARO, Respondent, v. BUFFALO WATERFRONT RESTAURANT CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 30, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 800

Citing Cases

Mancini v. Quality Markets, Inc.

Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Although…

LUGO v. COUNTY OF ESSEX INC. [3d Dept 1999

ects not within the purview of prior written notice statutes and is analogous to recognized exceptions…