Opinion
CRIMINAL NO. 09-00174-CG-B CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-00423-CG
03-13-2012
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court, with the exception of Footnote 3, found therein. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Footnote 3 of the Report and Recommendation refers to the "Statement of Reasons" entry which says that "the sentence is within an advisory guideline range that is not greater than twenty-four months...", and describes this statement as a discrepancy given the sentence imposed. The court finds that this statement is not a discrepancy, because it refers to number of months spanned in the difference between the low end and high end of the guideline range, and not to the range itself. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(1) requires the court to specify the reasons for imposing a sentence at a particular point in the range, if that range exceeds 24 months. See U.S. v. Mansur-Ramos, 348 F. 3d 29, 30 (1st Cir. 2003).
Callie V. S. Granade
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE