From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 31, 1921
89 So. 832 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)

Opinion

6 Div. 844.

May 31, 1921.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; William E. Fort, Judge.

James L. North was convicted of the larceny of an automobile, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


The appellant was convicted of grand larceny, the theft of an automobile, and sentenced to hard labor for the county for 12 months. Only two questions are presented for our consideration, in the introduction of the testimony. The two questions relate to the introduction by the state of a bill of sale and invoice for the automobile, their introduction being limited to showing the motor number on the car in question. In each instance the bill of exceptions recites that search has been made for the bill of sale and invoice, but they cannot be found, and hence neither is set out. The contents of these papers not being disclosed, we are unable to declare that the trial court was in error in permitting their introduction. We have given careful consideration to the entire record and find no reversible error. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

North v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 31, 1921
89 So. 832 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)
Case details for

North v. State

Case Details

Full title:NORTH v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 31, 1921

Citations

89 So. 832 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)
89 So. 832

Citing Cases

Allsup v. City of Piedmont

The ordinance not being set out in the bill of exceptions, the appellate court will not review the action of…