From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

North Side Foods Corp. v. Bag-Pack, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1612 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1612.

March 28, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2007, after the plaintiff, North Side Foods Corp., filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to strike or for partial dismissal was submitted by defendant, Bag-Pack, Inc., and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 23), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to strike or for partial dismissal submitted on behalf of Defendant (Docket No. 17) is denied


Summaries of

North Side Foods Corp. v. Bag-Pack, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 28, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1612 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2007)
Case details for

North Side Foods Corp. v. Bag-Pack, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NORTH SIDE FOODS CORP., Plaintiff, v. BAG-PACK, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 28, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1612 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2007)

Citing Cases

Gula v. Advanced Cargo Transp., Inc.

In analyzing defendant's motion, the court is cognizant that Rule 12(f) and 12(b)(6) serve different purposes…

Roamingwood Sewer & Water Ass'n v. Nat'l Diversified Sales, Inc.

Roamingwood responds that its strict liability claim permits punitive damages. (Doc. 177, p. 23 (citing N.…