From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norrod v. State

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville, December Term, 1956
Mar 8, 1957
300 S.W.2d 926 (Tenn. 1957)

Opinion

Opinion filed March 8, 1957.

COURTS.

The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal from the juvenile court. T.C.A. secs. 37-235, 37-273.

FROM OVERTON

B.H. HUNT, and HILLARD M. ROBERTS, Livingston, for plaintiff in error.

THOMAS E. FOX, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Prosecution for manslaughter. From judgment of conviction entered in Juvenile Court, Overton County, John A. Mitchell, Judge, sitting by Interchange, defendant appealed in error. The Supreme Court, Tomlinson, Justice, held that the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to hear a direct appeal from the juvenile court.

Appeal dismissed.


Norrod was convicted in 1956 in the Overton County Juvenile Court of involuntary manslaughter, and sentenced to one year in the State Training and Agricultural School. His appeal in error is to this Court.

By Chapter 177 of the Acts of 1955, Section 37-273, Code Supplement, appeal from the judgment of a Juvenile Court is to the Circuit Court. That was the law prior thereto. Code Section 37-235, and Doster v. State, 195 Tenn. 535, 260 S.W.2d 279. The only difference was in the manner and time in getting in Circuit Court. Hence, this Court does not have jurisdiction in the present status of this case. It must, therefore, dismiss the appeal in error, being without an alternative. State v. Bockman, 139 Tenn. 422, 427-428, 201 S.W. 741.

The foregoing mistake is apparently a very natural one for lawyers and Courts to make. It was made by this Court in Childress v. State, 133 Tenn. 121, 179 S.W. 643. See State v. Bockman, supra.

Appeal dismissed with costs adjudged against Norrod.


Summaries of

Norrod v. State

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville, December Term, 1956
Mar 8, 1957
300 S.W.2d 926 (Tenn. 1957)
Case details for

Norrod v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD NORROD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

Court:Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville, December Term, 1956

Date published: Mar 8, 1957

Citations

300 S.W.2d 926 (Tenn. 1957)
300 S.W.2d 926

Citing Cases

In re Houston

This Court under the 1911 act, which has been superseded by the present law, held that the determination of a…